Use Cases for Abnormal Behaviour Detection in Smart Homes

While people have many ideas about how a smart home should react to particular behaviours from their inhabitant, there seems to have been relatively little attempt to organise this systematically. In this paper, we attempt to rectify this in consideration of context awareness and novelty detection for a smart home that monitors its inhabitant for illness and unexpected behaviour. We do this through the concept of the Use Case, which is used in software engineering to specify the behaviour of a system. We describe a set of scenarios and the possible outputs that the smart home could give and introduce the SHMUC Repository of Smart Home Use Cases. Based on this, we can consider how probabilistic and logic-based reasoning systems would produce different capabilities

Exploring The Responsibilities Of Single-Inhabitant Smart Homes With Use Cases

DOI: 10.3233/AIS-2010-0076This paper makes a number of contributions to the field of requirements analysis for Smart Homes. It introduces Use Cases as a tool for exploring the responsibilities of Smart Homes and it proposes a modification of the conventional Use Case structure to suit the particular requirements of Smart Homes. It presents a taxonomy of Smart-Home-related Use Cases with seven categories. It draws on those Use Cases as raw material for developing questions and conclusions about the design of Smart Homes for single elderly inhabitants, and it introduces the SHMUC repository, a web-based repository of Use Cases related to Smart Homes that anyone can exploit and to which anyone may contribute

Using Rough Sets to Improve Activity Recognition Based on Sensor Data

Activity recognition plays a central role in many sensor-based applications, such as smart homes for instance. Given a stream of sensor data, the goal is to determine the activities that triggered the sensor data. This article shows how spatial information can be used to improve the process of recognizing activities in smart homes. The sensors that are used in smart homes are in most cases installed in fixed locations, which means that when a particular sensor is triggered, we know approximately where the activity takes place. However, since different sensors may be involved in different occurrences of the same type of activity, the set of sensors associated with a particular activity is not precisely defined. In this article, we use rough sets rather than standard sets to denote the sensors involved in an activity to model, which enables us to deal with this imprecision. Using publicly available data sets, we will demonstrate that rough sets can adequately capture useful information to assist with the activity recognition process. We will also show that rough sets lend themselves to creating Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Spatial Persistence

. We examine the spatial version of the persistence problem. In temporal reasoning, this is the problem of determining whether or not the validity of a fact at some point in time persists until another point in time, given that certain events or processes may happen in between. We show that its analog does intuitively exist in spatial reasoning, and review under the aspect of transferability to space different approaches for achieving persistence in temporal reasoning. Finally, we present reasoning with generalized spatial Allen relations as an instance of reasoning under the assumption of spatial persistence. Keywords: Spatial reasoning, persistence, Allen relations, fuzzy constraint satisfaction 1. Background: Interpreting Temporal Reasoning as Spatial During recent years, work on temporal and spatial reasoning has most often been performed independently from each other. However, some researchers, including ourselves, have found that spatial and temporal reasoning have enough in co..